Skip to content
Rights & Anti-corruption

UN 1951 Refugee Convention → Korea Refugee Act

BProbable echo
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Probable echo
Semantic
Strong semantic alignment
Temporal
Global precedent precedes Korea
Linkage
Official Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Multilingual semantic similarity
cosine similarity (method detail)0.757

Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.757); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.

Could also be…show
  • •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

62 year lag

From date field: 1951 Convention / 1967 Protocol → 2012 enactment / 2013 in force · 1951 Convention / 1967 Protocol → 2012 enactment / 2013 in force

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Bprobable echo · 76%

  • SemanticStrong semantic alignment
  • TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
  • LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Matched concepts: refugees ↔ 난민; 1951 Convention ↔ 협약; status ↔ 인정; 1951 Refugee Convention ↔ 난민법 난민협약 이행; non-refoulement principle ↔ 강제송환금지 원칙 법제화

Cross-lingual similarity 17/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: treaty accession codified into standalone domestic statute

Matched Concepts

7 pairs
refugees
↓
난민
1951 Convention
↓
협약
status
↓
인정
1951 Refugee Convention
↓
난민법 난민협약 이행
non-refoulement principle
↓
강제송환금지 원칙 법제화
Global Compact on Refugees (2018)
↓
글로벌 난민 컴팩트 국가行动计划
refugee status determination
↓
난민 인정 절차

Agenda Arc

Curated

Global purpose, Korean purpose, and precursor stages. Reasoning echo is discourse observation — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (adopted in Geneva on 28 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954) and its 1967 Protocol form the cornerstone of international refugee law.

Korean purpose

대한민국은 1992년 12월 「난민의 지위에 관한 협약」 및 동 의정서에 가입하였고, 그 이전까지 난민 인정은 「출입국관리법」에서만 다루어졌다. 이후 절차의 신속성·투명성·공정성을 제고하고 난민의 처우를 국제 기준에 맞추기 위해 「난민법」(법률 제11298호)이 2012년 2월 10일 제정되어 2013년 7월 1일부터 시행되었다(소관 부처: 법무부).

국가법령정보센터 · 난민법 — 대한민국은 1992년 12월 「난민의 지위에 관한 협약」 및 동 의정서에 가입하였고, 그 이전까지 난민 인정은 「출입국관리법」에서만 다루어졌다. 이후 절차의 신속성·투명성·공정성을 제고하고 난민의 처우를 국제 기준에 맞추기 위해 「난민법」(법률 제11298호)이 2012년 2월 10일 제정되어 2013년 7월 1일부터 시행되었다(소관 부처: 법무부).

Reasoning echo

Observed framing link: treaty accession codified into standalone domestic statute. Not a claim of coordination.

Started where

UN · UNHCR

Started how

1951 Convention / 1967 Protocol → 2012 enactment / 2013 in force

  1. Soft lawGlobal1951UN
    Convention / 1967 Protocol

    1951 Convention / 1967 Protocol

    Primary source
  2. LegislationKorea2012UN
    enactment / 2013 in force

    2012 enactment / 2013 in force

    Primary source
Original (Global)

The 1951 Convention② relating to the Status③ of Refugees① (adopted in Geneva on 28 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954) and its 1967 Protocol form the cornerstone of international refugee law. The Convention④'s Article 1A(2) defines a refugee as a person with a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, while Article 33 enshrines the principle of non-refoulement⑤, prohibiting return to a territory where life or freedom would be threatened. The 1967 Protocol removed the Convention's original temporal and geographic limits, extending it universally. UNHCR serves as guardian of both instruments, to which 146 states are party as of June 2026.

Echo (Korea)

대한민국은 1992년 12월 「난민①의 지위에 관한 협약②」 및 동 의정서에 가입하였고, 그 이전까지 난민 인정③은 「출입국관리법」에서만 다루어졌다. 이후 절차의 신속성·투명성·공정성을 제고하고 난민의 처우를 국제 기준에 맞추기 위해 「난민법」(법률 제11298호)이 2012년 2월 10일 제정되어 2013년 7월 1일부터 시행되었다(소관 부처: 법무부). 이는 아시아 최초의 독립 난민 법률이다. 제2조는 난민을 인종·종교·국적·특정 사회집단 구성원 신분·정치적 견해를 이유로 박해받을 우려가 있는 외국인으로 정의하여 협약 제1조A(2) 정의를 수용하였고, 제3조는 난민인정자·인도적체류자·난민신청자의 강제송환을 금지(농르풀망)한다. 그 밖에 난민인정 절차⑦, 협약에 따른 처우, 사회보장 등을 규정한다.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags
Origin
UNUNHCR
Timeline

1951 Convention / 1967 Protocol → 2012 enactment / 2013 in force

treaty accession codified into standalone domestic statute

Regional DiffusionJP · TW · SG · CN

Korea leads
▶
🇰🇷2013
No echo🇯🇵 Japan🇹🇼 Taiwan🇸🇬 Singapore🇨🇳 China

Korea 2013 난민법 = only standalone refugee statute in the peer set (Asia-first); peers absorb via immigration law or remain non-parties

Sources

Related Patterns

Semantically Related

Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.

Keywords
난민법난민협약난민의 지위에 관한 협약1967년 의정서비호농르풀망강제송환 금지난민인정인도적체류법무부출입국관리법Refugee Act1951 Refugee Convention1967 ProtocolUNHCRnon-refoulementasylumrefugee status determinationwell-founded fear of persecution
Score Guide
Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.
Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #refugee-convention-1