Skip to content
ImmigrationGlobal Compact + Soft Law Standards

UN Immigration Detention · GCR → Ministry of Justice

법무부, 헌법재판소

BProbable echo
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Probable echo
Semantic
Strong semantic alignment
Temporal
Global precedent precedes Korea
Linkage
Official Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Multilingual semantic similarity
cosine similarity (method detail)0.771

Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.771); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.

Could also be…show
  • •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

7 year lag
  1. Global

    2018

    UN

    unhcr.org

  2. then Korea
  3. Korea

    2025

    헌법재판소

    ccourt.go.kr

From date field: 2018 GCR → 2023 court → legislative process · 2018–2025

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Bprobable echo · 80%

  • SemanticStrong semantic alignment
  • TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
  • LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Matched concepts: alternatives to detention (ATD) ↔ 구금 대안; non-penalization of asylum seekers ↔ 난민 보호 범위

Cross-lingual similarity 26/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: soft law + litigation channel

Matched Concepts

2 pairs
alternatives to detention (ATD)
↓
구금 대안
non-penalization of asylum seekers
↓
난민 보호 범위

Suggested Concepts

1 suggested

Auto-aligned concept pairs surfaced by our Concept Suggester engine. Shown as supplementary leads — the curated matches above are the authoritative set.

UNHCR Global Compact on Refugees promotes alternatives to detention (ATD) and non-penalization of asylum seekers.
Keyword↓
헌법재판소 구금·출입국관리법 판결: 구금 정당성·난민 보호 범위는 해당 결정문을 기준으로 확인.

Agenda Arc

Curated

Global purpose, Korean purpose, and precursor stages. Reasoning echo is discourse observation — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

GCR (nonbinding) and UNHCR detention guidance emphasize last resort and alternatives to detention.

Korean purpose

「출입국관리법」 제63조 등에 대한 헌법재판소 결정 및 국회 입법·정부 시행(공문·헌재·국회 자료 기준).

헌법재판소 — 「출입국관리법」 제63조 등에 대한 헌법재판소 결정 및 국회 입법·정부 시행(공문·헌재·국회 자료 기준).

Reasoning echo

Global purpose leads with “GCR (nonbinding) and UNHCR detention guidance emphasize last resort and alternatives to detention.”; Korean purpose leads with “「출입국관리법」 제63조 등에 대한 헌법재판소 결정 및 국회 입법·정부 시행(공문·헌재·국회 자료 기준).”. Framing comparison only.

Started where

UN · UNHCR

Started how

2018 GCR → 2023 court → legislative process

  1. Soft lawGlobal2018UN
    GCR

    2018 GCR

    Primary source
  2. StageGlobal2023UN
    court

    2023 court

  3. Soft lawKoreaUN
    legislative process

    legislative process

    Primary source
Original (Global)

UNHCR Global Compact on Refugees promotes alternatives① to detention (ATD) and non-penalization of asylum seekers②.

Echo (Korea)

헌법재판소 구금·출입국관리법 판결: 구금 정당성·난민 보호 범위②는 해당 결정문을 기준으로 확인.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

norm diffusionjudicial dialogueinternational standards
Origin
UNUNHCR
Timeline

2018–2025

soft law + litigation channel

Sources

🌍UNHCR Global Compact on Refugees
🌍헌법재판소 판례

Related Patterns

UNHCR Refugee Convention → Korea Refugee Act

UNUNHCR
P(B|A) = 61%category
42%

1951 Refugee Convention → Korea Refugee Act (난민법)

UNUNHCR
P(B|A) = 36%agenda
42%

Judicial Independence Under Pressure

UN
P(B|A) = 36%agenda
23%

UNHCR Asylum Procedures → Korea Refugee Status Determination

UNHCR
P(B|A) = 46%category
22%

UNHCR #IBelong Campaign → Korea Statelessness Prevention

UNHCR
P(B|A) = 56%category
21%

UNHCR Resettlement Program → Korea Refugee Resettlement Pilot

UNHCR
P(B|A) = 56%temporal
21%

ESG / Climate Disclosure

UN
P(B|A) = 30%agenda
20%

Soft Power & Cultural Export (K-content)

UN
20%

Semantically Related

Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.

UNHCR Asylum Procedures → Korea Refugee Status Determination

Immigration

cos 0.89

Networked Global Governance Matrix

Rights & Anti-corruption

cos 0.89

1951 Refugee Convention → Korea Refugee Act (난민법)

Rights & Anti-corruption

cos 0.89

UNHCR Refugee Convention → Korea Refugee Act

Immigration

cos 0.89

UNHCR Resettlement Program → Korea Refugee Resettlement Pilot

Immigration

cos 0.88

UNODC/UNTOC Protocol on Human Trafficking → Korea Criminal Act & Act on Prevention of Human Trafficking

Labor & Work

cos 0.88
Keywords
GCRGlobal Compact on Refugeesdetentionimmigration detentionalternatives to detentionATDasylumasylum seekerrefugeemigrantdeportationimmigrationundocumentedUNHCR출입국난민이민자구금외국인보호소비자체류judicial self-investigationrule of lawcourt independenceUNHCR pressureGCR implementation사법 독립
Score Guide
Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.
Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #detention-1