Other✓ verified

BIS Basel III Basel III LCR → 은행업감독규정 → Financial Services Commission

금융위원회 (FSC) / 금융감독원 (FSS)

CSuggestive similarity

Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

A single score cannot prove an echo. This card triangulates semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.

Suggestive similarity

Semantic

Strong semantic alignment

Temporal

Global precedent precedes Korea

Linkage

No recorded linkage

Tier C — Suggestive similarity — semantic or keyword overlap + plausible timing

Multilingual semantic similarity

cosine similarity (method detail)0.841

Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.841); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.

Aligned sentences

Basel III LCR requires banks to hold sufficient HQLA to cover net cash outflows over a 30-day stress period, with Level 1 and Level 2 HQLA classifications and a minimum 100% requirement.

aligned

금융위·금감원은 은행업감독규정을 통해 바젤 III LCR을 도입하여 LCR 산정방법, HQLA 분류기준(레벨1·2A·2B), 적용대상, 위반시 조치사항을 상세히 규정하고 있다.

Could also be…

•Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
•Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
•A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Csuggestive similarity · 65%

SemanticStrong semantic alignment
TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
LinkageNo recorded linkage

Matched concepts: LCR ≥ 100% minimum requirement ↔ LCR 산정방법: 고유동성자산 ÷ 30일 순현금유출액 ≥ 100%; Level 1 HQLA (central bank reserves, sovereign) ↔ 레벨1 HQLA: 현금·국채·한은예치금; Level 2A/2B HQLA with haircuts ↔ 레벨2A(15% 할인)·레벨2B(50% 할인) HQLA 분류기준; phase-in from 60% to 100% ↔ 2015년 60% → 2019년 100% 단계적 도입

Cross-lingual similarity 69/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: Basel III LCR (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Liquidity Rules) | LCR ≥ 100% minimum requirement → LCR 산정방법: 고유동성자산 ÷ 30일 순현금유출액 ≥ 100%

Caveat: semantic similarity only — this tier records a hypothesis, not proof of causal influence.

Matched Concepts

4 pairs

GlobalKorean Echo

LCR ≥ 100% minimum requirement

↓→

LCR 산정방법: 고유동성자산 ÷ 30일 순현금유출액 ≥ 100%

Level 1 HQLA (central bank reserves, sovereign)

↓→

레벨1 HQLA: 현금·국채·한은예치금

Level 2A/2B HQLA with haircuts

↓→

레벨2A(15% 할인)·레벨2B(50% 할인) HQLA 분류기준

phase-in from 60% to 100%

↓→

2015년 60% → 2019년 100% 단계적 도입

Original (Global)

Basel III LCR requires banks to hold sufficient HQLA to cover net cash outflows over a 30-day stress period, with Level 1 and Level 2 HQLA classifications and a minimum 100% requirement.

Echo (Korea)

Echo Strength

sourceVerified

hasKoreanSource

hasGlobalSource

hasDate

keywordDiversity

agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning

Origin

BIS Basel III

Timeline

2010–2023

Basel III LCR (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Liquidity Rules) | LCR ≥ 100% minimum requirement → LCR 산정방법: 고유동성자산 ÷ 30일 순현금유출액 ≥ 100%

Sources

🌍Global source archived

🇰🇷은행업감독규정 (국가법령정보센터)

Related Patterns

Basel III NSFR (Net Stable Funding Ratio) → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Stable Funding Rules)

BISFSB

P(B|A) = 77%category

55%

Basel III Leverage Ratio → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Leverage Ratio Rules)

BISFSB

P(B|A) = 76%category

52%

Basel III Large Exposures Framework → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Large Exposure Limits)

BISFSB

P(B|A) = 76%category

52%

BIS Basel III Endgame → Korea Banking Capital & Liquidity Rules

BIS

P(B|A) = 27%agenda

33%

Basel III Banking Regulation & BIS RCAP

BIS

P(B|A) = 34%agenda

28%

FSB Global Crypto Regulatory Framework → Korea Virtual Asset User Protection Act

FSB

25%

BIS Innovation Hub → Korea Fintech Regulatory Sandbox

BIS

24%

BIS Basel III Climate Risk → Korean Banking Supervision

BIS

23%

FSB Climate-Related Financial Risks → Korea Climate Stress Testing

FSB

22%

BIS Blueprint for Future Monetary System → Korea Digital Financial Infrastructure

BIS

22%

FSB Macroprudential Policy & Korea Financial Stability Framework

FSB

21%

CBDC / Digital Currency

BIS

20%

CBDC + Stablecoin Ecosystem

BIS

20%

BIS Project Agora → Korea CBDC & Tokenized Cross-Border Payments

BIS

20%

EU PSD2 Open Banking → Korea MyData & Open Banking

FSBBIS

P(B|A) = 53%category

17%

FSB/NGFS Climate Stress Testing → 금융위·금감원 기후 스트레스테스트 가이드라인 (FSC/FSS Climate Stress Test Guidance)

FSB

16%

Climate Stress Testing (NGFS / Central Bank)

BIS

16%

Central Bank Climate Risk Integration (NGFS)

BIS

15%

CPMI-IOSCO PFMI → Korea BOK Payment System Oversight

BIS

P(B|A) = 25%agenda

13%

Semantically Related

Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.

Basel III Leverage Ratio → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Leverage Ratio Rules)

Other

cos 0.92

Basel III NSFR (Net Stable Funding Ratio) → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Stable Funding Rules)

Other

cos 0.92

Basel III Large Exposures Framework → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Large Exposure Limits)

Other

cos 0.91

Basel III Banking Regulation & BIS RCAP

Finance

cos 0.91

BIS Basel III Climate Risk → Korean Banking Supervision

Finance

cos 0.88

BIS Basel III Endgame → Korea Banking Capital & Liquidity Rules

Finance

cos 0.88

Keywords

Basel III바젤 IIILCR유동성커버리지비율HQLA고유동성자산은행업감독규정금융위원회FSC금융감독원FSSliquidity risk유동성 리스크스트레스 테스트NSFR

Score Guide

Confidence — Editorial judgment, now shown as a confidence tier (A–D) based on semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence. Not proof of causation.

Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.

Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.