Skip to content
Finance

BIS Basel III Basel III Leverage Ratio → 은행업감독규정 → Financial Services Commission

금융위원회 (FSC) / 금융감독원 (FSS)

CSuggestive similarity
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Suggestive similarity
Semantic
Strong semantic alignment
Temporal
Global precedent precedes Korea
Linkage
No recorded linkage
Multilingual semantic similarity
cosine similarity (method detail)0.807

Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.807); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.

Could also be…show
  • •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

6 year lag
  1. Global

    2014

    BIS Basel III

    bis.org

  2. then Korea
  3. Korea

    2020

    은행업감독규정 (국가법령정보센터)

    law.go.kr

From date field: Basel III Leverage Ratio 2014/2017 → Korea introduced 2018 → D-SIB buffer 2020 · 2014–2020

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Csuggestive similarity · 65%

  • SemanticStrong semantic alignment
  • TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
  • LinkageNo recorded linkage

Matched concepts: minimum 3% Tier 1 / exposure ↔ 레버리지비율 산정방법: 기본자본 ÷ 총익스포저 ≥ 3%; total exposure measure components ↔ 총익스포저 산입항목(대차대조표·파생상품·SFT·부외항목); G-SIB additional leverage buffer ↔ D-SIB 추가 레버리지 완충자본(1%p); quarterly disclosure ↔ 분기별 보고주기

Cross-lingual similarity 48/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: Basel III Leverage Ratio → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Leverage Ratio Rules) | minimum 3% Tier 1 / exposure → 레버리지비율 산정방법: 기본자본 ÷ 총익스포저 ≥ 3%

Caveat: semantic similarity only — this tier records a hypothesis, not proof of causal influence.

Matched Concepts

4 pairs
minimum 3% Tier 1 / exposure
↓
레버리지비율 산정방법: 기본자본 ÷ 총익스포저 ≥ 3%
total exposure measure components
↓
총익스포저 산입항목(대차대조표·파생상품·SFT·부외항목)
G-SIB additional leverage buffer
↓
D-SIB 추가 레버리지 완충자본(1%p)
quarterly disclosure
↓
분기별 보고주기

Agenda Arc

Curated

Global purpose, Korean purpose, and precursor stages. Reasoning echo is discourse observation — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

Basel III Leverage Ratio requires banks to maintain a minimum Tier 1 capital to total exposure ratio of 3%.

Korean purpose

금융위원회와 금융감독원은 은행업감독규정을 통해 바젤 III 레버리지비율을 국내에 도입하여, 레버리지비율 산정방법(기본자본 ÷ 총익스포저 ≥ 3%), 총익스포저 산입항목(대차대조표 자산, 파생상품 익스포저, 증권금융거래 익스포저, 부외항목의 신용환산액), 국내 시스템적 중요은행(D-SIB)에 대한 추가 레버리지 완충자본(1%p), 적용대상 및 보고주기(분기별)를 규정하고 있다.

은행업감독규정 (국가법령정보센터) — 금융위원회와 금융감독원은 은행업감독규정을 통해 바젤 III 레버리지비율을 국내에 도입하여, 레버리지비율 산정방법(기본자본 ÷ 총익스포저 ≥ 3%), 총익스포저 산입항목(대차대조표 자산, 파생상품 익스포저, 증권금융거래 익스포저, 부외항목의 신용환산액), 국내 시스템적 중요은행(D-SIB)에 대한 추가 레버리지 완충자본(1%p), 적용대상 및 보고주기(분기별)를 규정하고 있다.

Reasoning echo

Observed framing link: Basel III Leverage Ratio → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Leverage Ratio Rules) | minimum 3% Tier 1 / exposure → 레버리지비율 산정방법: 기본자본 ÷ 총익스포저 ≥ 3%. Not a claim of coordination.

Started where

BIS Basel III

Started how

Basel III Leverage Ratio 2014/2017 → Korea introduced 2018 → D-SIB buffer 2020

  1. Soft lawGlobal2014BIS Basel III
    Basel III Leverage Ratio 2014/2017

    Basel III Leverage Ratio 2014/2017

    Primary source
  2. StageKorea2018금융위원회 (FSC) / 금융감독원 (FSS)
    Korea introduced 2018

    Korea introduced 2018

    Primary source
  3. Soft lawGlobal2020BIS Basel III
    D-SIB buffer 2020

    D-SIB buffer 2020

Original (Global)

Basel III Leverage Ratio requires banks to maintain a minimum Tier 1 capital to total exposure① ratio of 3%, with an additional③ buffer for G-SIBs.

Echo (Korea)

금융위·금감원은 은행업감독규정을 통해 바젤 III 레버리지비율①을 도입하여 산정방법(기본자본÷총익스포저≥3%), 총익스포저 산입항목, D-SIB 추가 완충자본, 분기별 보고를 규정하고 있다.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning
Origin
BIS Basel III
Timeline

2014–2020

Basel III Leverage Ratio → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Leverage Ratio Rules) | minimum 3% Tier 1 / exposure → 레버리지비율 산정방법: 기본자본 ÷ 총익스포저 ≥ 3%

Sources

🌍Global source
🇰🇷은행업감독규정 (국가법령정보센터)

Related Patterns

Basel III Large Exposures Framework → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Large Exposure Limits)

BISFSB
P(B|A) = 83%temporal
56%

Basel III LCR (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Liquidity Rules)

BISFSB
P(B|A) = 76%category
52%

Basel III NSFR (Net Stable Funding Ratio) → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Stable Funding Rules)

BISFSB
P(B|A) = 81%temporal
52%

Basel III Banking Regulation & BIS RCAP

BIS
P(B|A) = 65%temporal
30%

BIS Basel III Endgame → Korea Banking Capital & Liquidity Rules

BIS
P(B|A) = 59%temporal
29%

FSB Global Crypto Regulatory Framework → Korea Virtual Asset User Protection Act

FSB
P(B|A) = 47%category
25%

BIS Innovation Hub → Korea Fintech Regulatory Sandbox

BIS
P(B|A) = 57%category
24%

BIS Basel III Climate Risk → Korean Banking Supervision

BIS
P(B|A) = 46%category
23%

Semantically Related

Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.

Basel III Large Exposures Framework → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Large Exposure Limits)

Finance

cos 0.94

Basel III Banking Regulation & BIS RCAP

Finance

cos 0.92

Basel III NSFR (Net Stable Funding Ratio) → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Stable Funding Rules)

Finance

cos 0.92

Basel III LCR (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) → 은행업감독규정 (FSC/FSS Liquidity Rules)

Finance

cos 0.92

BIS Basel III Endgame → Korea Banking Capital & Liquidity Rules

Finance

cos 0.91

BIS Basel III Climate Risk → Korean Banking Supervision

Finance

cos 0.87
Keywords
Basel III바젤 IIIleverage ratio레버리지비율Tier 1기본자본total exposure총익스포저G-SIBD-SIB은행업감독규정금융위원회FSC금융감독원FSS
Score Guide
Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.
Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #basel3-leverage-ratio-fsc