Skip to content
Trade & Supply Chain✓ verified

WTO Government Procurement Agreement → Korea Government Procurement System → 조달청

조달청 (Public Procurement Service), 기획재정부 (Ministry of Economy and Finance)

BProbable echo
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

A single score cannot prove an echo. This card triangulates semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.

Probable echo
Semantic
Strong semantic alignment
Temporal
Global precedent precedes Korea
Linkage
Official Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Tier B Probable echo — agency/committee linkage + global-first timing + semantic signal
Multilingual semantic similarity
cosine similarity (method detail)0.813

Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.813); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.

Could also be…

  • Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Bprobable echo · 85%

  • SemanticStrong semantic alignment
  • TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
  • LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Matched concepts: open government procurement market 정부조달시장 개방; transparent procurement procedures 투명한 조달절차 (나라장터 공개); non-discriminatory treatment of foreign suppliers 외국 공급자 비차별 대우; threshold-based coverage 기준액 이상 조달 의무 적용

Cross-lingual similarity 52/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: WTO Government Procurement Agreement → Korea Government Procurement System | open government procurement market → 정부조달시장 개방

Matched Concepts

4 pairs
open government procurement market
정부조달시장 개방
transparent procurement procedures
투명한 조달절차 (나라장터 공개)
non-discriminatory treatment of foreign suppliers
외국 공급자 비차별 대우
threshold-based coverage
기준액 이상 조달 의무 적용
Original (Global)

The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) requires parties to open their government procurement markets to foreign suppliers with transparent, non-discriminatory procedures.

Echo (Korea)

대한민국은 「국가를 당사자로 하는 계약에 관한 법률」과 국가종합전자조달시스템(나라장터, KONEPS)을 통해 WTO GPA 의무를 이행한다.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning
Origin
WTO (World Trade Organization)
Timeline

1994–2024

WTO Government Procurement Agreement → Korea Government Procurement System | open government procurement market → 정부조달시장 개방

Sources

Related Patterns

WTO Government Procurement Agreement → Korea National Contracts Act & KONEPS

WTO
P(B|A) = 55%agenda
50%

WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement → Korea Customs Act Reform

WTO
P(B|A) = 60%category
40%

WTO SPS Agreement → Korea Food Sanitation Act

WTO
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

WTO TBT Agreement → Korea Industrial Standards Act

WTO
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

WTO SCM Agreement → Korea Subsidy Regulation Framework

WTO
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

WTO TBT Agreement → 국가표준기본법 TBT 협정 이행

WTO
P(B|A) = 35%agenda
40%

WTO SPS Agreement → 식품위생법 SPS 협정 이행

WTO
P(B|A) = 35%agenda
40%

WTO Agreement on Agriculture → Korea Agricultural Tariff & Subsidy Reform

WTO
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement → Korea Anti-Dumping Duty System

WTO
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding → Korea WTO Litigation Practice

WTO
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

EU-Korea FTA Chapter 9 (Government Procurement) → 국가계약법·조달사업법 (Procurement Chapter Implementation)

WTO
P(B|A) = 29%agenda
39%

WTO SPS & Imported Food Safety Alignment

WTO
P(B|A) = 45%category
20%

UPOV Convention → Korea Plant Variety Protection Act

WTO
20%

DEPA (Digital Economy Partnership Agreement) → 데이터기반행정법·전자문서법 (DEPA Accession Alignment)

WTO
20%

RCEP Chapter 12 (E-Commerce) → 전자상거래법·개인정보보호법 (RCEP Digital Trade Implementation)

WTO
P(B|A) = 45%category
20%

CPTPP Chapter 14 (E-Commerce) → 전자문서법·개인정보보호법 (CPTPP Digital Trade Alignment)

WTO
P(B|A) = 40%category
13%

KORUS FTA Chapter 18 (IPR Enforcement) → 저작권법 개정 (Copyright Act Amendment for KORUS)

WTO
13%

EU-Korea FTA Chapter 5 (SPS) → 식품위생법·식물방역법 (SPS Chapter Implementation)

WTO
13%

EU-Korea FTA Chapter 4 (TBT) → 국가표준기본법·전기용품안전법 (TBT Chapter Implementation)

WTO
13%

KORUS FTA Chapter 13 (Financial Services) → 금융위·금감원 규제 (Financial Services Chapter Implementation)

WTO
13%

CPTPP Accession → Korean Trade Law & Data Sovereignty

WTO
10%

Codex Alimentarius Standards → KS H Codex 식품규격 (Korean Food Standards)

WTO
P(B|A) = 28%agenda
10%

Semantically Related

Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.

Keywords
GPAgovernment procurementKONEPS나라장터정부조달협정국가계약법전자조달공개경쟁입찰조달청thresholdplurilateral
Score Guide
ConfidenceEditorial judgment, now shown as a confidence tier (A–D) based on semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence. Not proof of causation.
Echo StrengthMetadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary OverlapHeuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #wto-gpa-2