UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency → Korea Debtor Rehabilitation Act → Ministry of Justice
법무부 (Ministry of Justice), 법원 (Courts of Korea)
Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.
Evidence Scorecard
Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.
Could also be…show
- •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
- •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
- •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.
Timeline of the echo
29 year lagFirst Korean mention한국 통합도산법
From date field: 1997 UNCITRAL 국제도산 모델법 → 2005 한국 통합도산법 → 2022 개정 (UNCITRAL 도산규칙 반영) · 1997–2024
Interrogate the Evidence
Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.
Bprobable echo · 88%
- SemanticStrong semantic alignment
- TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
- LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Matched concepts: recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings ↔ 외국도산절차의 승인; access of foreign representatives ↔ 외국관재인의 법적 지위; coordination of concurrent proceedings ↔ 국내·외 도산절차의 병행 조정; protection of creditors' interests ↔ 채권자 이익 보호
Cross-lingual similarity 7/100 (heuristic fallback) — a computed signal, not proof.
Similarity type: UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency → Korea Debtor Rehabilitation Act | recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings → 외국도산절차의 승인
Matched Concepts
4 pairsAgenda Arc
DerivedBuilt live from origin, soft-law type, timeline, and sources — not a new research claim. Global vs Korean purpose are observed framings — not proof of coordination.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (1997) provides a framework for cooperation between courts and insolvency administrators across jurisdictions.
대한민국은 「채무자 회생 및 파산에 관한 법률」(통합도산법, 2005.3.31 제정)을 통해 UNCITRAL 국제도산 모델법의 원칙을 국내법에 반영했다. 제6편(국제도산)에서 외국도산절차의 승인·지원(제632조 이하), 외국관재인의 법적 지위(제637조), 국내·외 도산절차의 병행 조정(제641조)을 규정한다.
채무자 회생 및 파산에 관한 법률 — 대한민국은 「채무자 회생 및 파산에 관한 법률」(통합도산법, 2005.3.31 제정)을 통해 UNCITRAL 국제도산 모델법의 원칙을 국내법에 반영했다. 제6편(국제도산)에서 외국도산절차의 승인·지원(제632조 이하), 외국관재인의 법적 지위(제637조), 국내·외 도산절차의 병행 조정(제641조)을 규정한다.
Observed framing link: UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency → Korea Debtor Rehabilitation Act | recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings → 외국도산절차의 승인. Not a claim of coordination.
UNCITRAL (UN Commission on International Trade Law)
via policy learning — timeline: 1997 UNCITRAL 국제도산 모델법 → 2005 한국 통합도산법 → 2022 개정 (UNCITRAL 도산규칙 반영)
- Soft lawKorea1997법무부 (Ministry of Justice)UNCITRAL 국제도산 모델법
1997 UNCITRAL 국제도산 모델법
Primary source - StageKorea2005법무부 (Ministry of Justice)한국 통합도산법
2005 한국 통합도산법
- LegislationKorea2022법무부 (Ministry of Justice)개정 (UNCITRAL 도산규칙 반영)
2022 개정 (UNCITRAL 도산규칙 반영)
Primary source
The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency provides a framework for cooperation between courts and insolvency administrators across jurisdictions.
대한민국은 「채무자 회생 및 파산에 관한 법률」(통합도산법)을 통해 UNCITRAL 국제도산 모델법의 원칙을 국내법에 반영했다. 제6편(국제도산)에서 외국도산절차의 승인①·지원을 규정한다.
Echo Strength
Influence Mechanism
1997–2024
UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency → Korea Debtor Rehabilitation Act | recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings → 외국도산절차의 승인
Sources
Related Patterns
UNCITRAL Model Law on E-Commerce → Korea Framework Act on Electronic Commerce
UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce → 전자문서법 UNCITRAL 모델법 반영
UNCITRAL Rotterdam Rules → Korea Commercial Act Maritime Transport
UNCITRAL Cross-Border Insolvency Model Law → Korea Debtor Rehabilitation Act
UNCITRAL Model Law on Arbitration → Korea Arbitration Act
UNCITRAL CISG → Korea International Sale of Goods Act
Hague Apostille Convention → Korea Document Authentication
CPTPP Chapter 14 (E-Commerce) → 전자문서법·개인정보보호법 (CPTPP Digital Trade Alignment)