CAT Article 4 → Korea Criminal Act & Administration of Criminal Detention Act → Ministry of Justice
법무부 (Ministry of Justice), 국가인권위원회 (National Human Rights Commission of Korea)
Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.
Evidence Scorecard
Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.
Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.765); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.
Could also be…show
- •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
- •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
- •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.
Timeline of the echo
38 year lagFrom date field: 1987 CAT entry into force → 1995 Korea CAT accession → 2007 Korea Criminal Detention Act → ongoing · 1995–2025
Interrogate the Evidence
Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.
Bprobable echo · 82%
- SemanticStrong semantic alignment
- TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
- LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Matched concepts: torture as criminal offence (Article 4.1) ↔ 폭행·가혹행위죄 (형법 제125조); appropriate penalties (Article 4.2) ↔ 공무원 직권남용 가중처벌 (형법 제135조); prohibition of cruel treatment (Article 16) ↔ 수용자 인권존중 및 차별금지 (형집행법 제4조, 제5조)
Cross-lingual similarity 22/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.
Similarity type: CAT Article 4 (Criminalization of torture) → Korea Criminal Act & Administration of Criminal Detention Act | torture as criminal offence (Article 4.1) → 폭행·가혹행위죄 (형법 제125조)
Matched Concepts
3 pairsAgenda Arc
CuratedGlobal purpose, Korean purpose, and precursor stages. Reasoning echo is discourse observation — not proof of coordination.
Carry UN rules into domestic effect: align Korea Criminal Act & Administration of Criminal Detention Act under CAT Article 4 (Criminalization of torture).
대한민국은 형법 제125조(폭행·가혹행위) 및 제273조(학대)를 통해 공무원의 직권남용에 의한 폭행·가혹행위를 처벌하고, 형의 집행 및 수용자의 처우에 관한 법률(2007년 제정)에서 수용자의 인권 존중과 차별금지를 명시하고 있다. 2007년 형집행법 제정은 CAT 가입 이후 수용자 처우의 국제적 기준을 반영한 것이다.
형의 집행 및 수용자의 처우에 관한 법률 (law.go.kr) — 대한민국은 형법 제125조(폭행·가혹행위) 및 제273조(학대)를 통해 공무원의 직권남용에 의한 폭행·가혹행위를 처벌하고, 형의 집행 및 수용자의 처우에 관한 법률(2007년 제정)에서 수용자의 인권 존중과 차별금지를 명시하고 있다. 2007년 형집행법 제정은 CAT 가입 이후 수용자 처우의 국제적 기준을 반영한 것이다.
Observed framing link: CAT Article 4 (Criminalization of torture) → Korea Criminal Act & Administration of Criminal Detention Act | torture as criminal offence (Article 4.1) → 폭행·가혹행위죄 (형법 제125조). Not a claim of coordination.
CAT (UN Committee against Torture)
1987 CAT entry into force → 1995 Korea CAT accession → 2007 Korea Criminal Detention Act → ongoing
- Soft lawGlobal1987CAT (UN Committee against Torture)CAT entry into force
1987 CAT entry into force
Primary source - StageKorea1995법무부 (Ministry of Justice)Korea CAT accession
1995 Korea CAT accession
- LegislationKorea2007법무부 (Ministry of Justice)Korea Criminal Detention Act
2007 Korea Criminal Detention Act
Primary source - Soft lawGlobalCAT (UN Committee against Torture)ongoing
ongoing
CAT Article 4 requires each State Party to ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal① law, including attempts, complicity, and participation, punishable by appropriate② penalties reflecting their grave nature.
대한민국은 형법 제125조(폭행·가혹행위) 및 제273조(학대)를 통해 공무원의 직권남용②에 의한 폭행·가혹행위를 처벌하고, 형의 집행 및 수용자의 처우에 관한 법률(2007년 제정)에서 수용자의 인권 존중과 차별금지를 명시하고 있다. 2007년 형집행법 제정은 CAT 가입 이후 수용자 처우의 국제적 기준을 반영한 것이다.
Echo Strength
Influence Mechanism
1995–2025
CAT Article 4 (Criminalization of torture) → Korea Criminal Act & Administration of Criminal Detention Act | torture as criminal offence (Article 4.1) → 폭행·가혹행위죄 (형법 제125조)
Sources
Related Patterns
UN Convention Against Torture (CAT/OPCAT) → Korea
cat-torture-1
CAT Universal Jurisdiction for Torture → Korea Criminal Act Extraterritorial Application
OPCAT National Preventive Mechanism → Korea NPM Designation
CAT Right to Rehabilitation → Korea Torture Victims Support System
ESG / Climate Disclosure
Soft Power & Cultural Export (K-content)
Judicial Independence Under Pressure
Semantically Related
Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.
UN Convention Against Torture (CAT/OPCAT) → Korea
Rights & Anti-corruption
CAT Universal Jurisdiction for Torture → Korea Criminal Act Extraterritorial Application
Rights & Anti-corruption
CAT Right to Rehabilitation → Korea Torture Victims Support System
Rights & Anti-corruption
CEDAW Article 7 (Political participation) → Korea Gender Equality Act & Political Parties Act
Rights & Anti-corruption
CRPD Article 9 (Accessibility) → Korea Disability Anti-Discrimination Act & Convenience Promotion Act
Rights & Anti-corruption
OECD Anti-Bribery Convention → Korea Foreign Bribery Act & Enforcement Gap
Rights & Anti-corruption