Skip to content
Trade & Supply Chain

WIPO Design Law Treaty → 디자인보호법 → 특허청

특허청

CSuggestive similarity
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Suggestive similarity
Semantic
Strong semantic alignment
Temporal
Same time period / concurrent
Linkage
Official Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Multilingual semantic similarity
cosine similarity (method detail)0.850

Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.850); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.

Aligned sentences

WIPO Design Law Treaty streamlines industrial design registration procedures.

aligned

디자인보호법은 WIPO DLT에 정합한 디자인등록 절차를 운영한다.

Could also be…show
  • •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

Same year
  1. Global

    2024

    WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)

    wipo.int

  2. then Korea
  3. Korea

    2024

    디자인보호법 (법제처)

    law.go.kr

From date field: 2024 WIPO DLT 채택 → 디자인보호법 국제조화 · 2023–2024

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Csuggestive similarity · 80%

  • SemanticStrong semantic alignment
  • TemporalSame time period / concurrent
  • LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Matched concepts: design law treaty (DLT) ↔ 디자인법조약 (DLT); industrial design registration ↔ 디자인등록; harmonization of procedures ↔ 절차 조화

Cross-lingual similarity 75/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: WIPO Design Law Treaty → 디자인보호법 (디자인등록) | design law treaty (DLT) → 디자인법조약 (DLT)

Caveat: semantic similarity only — this tier records a hypothesis, not proof of causal influence.

Matched Concepts

3 pairs
design law treaty (DLT)
↓
디자인법조약 (DLT)
industrial design registration
↓
디자인등록
harmonization of procedures
↓
절차 조화

Agenda Arc

Curated

Global purpose, Korean purpose, and precursor stages. Reasoning echo is discourse observation — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

The WIPO Design Law Treaty (DLT, 2024) aims to streamline and harmonize procedures for industrial design registration, making design protection more accessible and efficient globally.

Korean purpose

한국은 WIPO DLT 협상에 적극 참여하였으며, 「디자인보호법」은 이미 국제적 절차 조화를 반영하여 디자인등록 출원, 심사, 등록 절차를 운영하고 있다. 2023년 디자인보호법 개정으로 디지털 디자인(화상디자인) 보호가 강화되었다.

디자인보호법 (법제처) — 한국은 WIPO DLT 협상에 적극 참여하였으며, 「디자인보호법」은 이미 국제적 절차 조화를 반영하여 디자인등록 출원, 심사, 등록 절차를 운영하고 있다. 2023년 디자인보호법 개정으로 디지털 디자인(화상디자인) 보호가 강화되었다.

Reasoning echo

Observed framing link: WIPO Design Law Treaty → 디자인보호법 (디자인등록) | design law treaty (DLT) → 디자인법조약 (DLT). Not a claim of coordination.

Started where

WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)

Started how

2024 WIPO DLT 채택 → 디자인보호법 국제조화

  1. CapabilityKorea2024특허청
    WIPO DLT 채택

    2024 WIPO DLT 채택

    Primary source
  2. LegislationKorea특허청
    디자인보호법 국제조화

    디자인보호법 국제조화

    Primary source
Original (Global)

WIPO Design① Law Treaty streamlines industrial design registration② procedures.

Echo (Korea)

디자인보호법은 WIPO DLT에 정합한 디자인등록② 절차를 운영한다.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning
Origin
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)
Timeline

2023–2024

WIPO Design Law Treaty → 디자인보호법 (디자인등록) | design law treaty (DLT) → 디자인법조약 (DLT)

Sources

🌍Global source
🇰🇷디자인보호법 (법제처)

Related Patterns

WIPO Trademark Law Treaty → 상표법 (상표등록절차)

WIPO
P(B|A) = 62%category
43%

WIPO Patent Law Treaty → 특허법 (특허절차 간소화)

WIPO
P(B|A) = 61%category
42%

WIPO Budapest Treaty → 한국 미생물 기탁제도

WIPO
P(B|A) = 61%category
42%

WIPO Internet Treaties WCT/WPPT & Korea Copyright Act

WIPO
P(B|A) = 61%category
41%

WIPO Copyright Treaty → Korea Digital Copyright Law

WIPO
P(B|A) = 36%agenda
41%

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) → 특허법 PCT 국제특허출원

WIPO
P(B|A) = 35%agenda
40%

UPOV Convention → Korea Plant Variety Protection Act

WIPO
P(B|A) = 45%category
20%

KORUS FTA Chapter 18 (IPR Enforcement) → 저작권법 개정 (Copyright Act Amendment for KORUS)

WIPO
P(B|A) = 41%category
15%

Semantically Related

Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.

WIPO Trademark Law Treaty → 상표법 (상표등록절차)

Trade & Supply Chain

cos 0.91

WIPO Patent Law Treaty → 특허법 (특허절차 간소화)

Trade & Supply Chain

cos 0.90

WIPO Copyright Treaty → Korea Digital Copyright Law

AI & Digital

cos 0.89

WIPO Internet Treaties WCT/WPPT & Korea Copyright Act

Trade & Supply Chain

cos 0.87

WIPO Budapest Treaty → 한국 미생물 기탁제도

Trade & Supply Chain

cos 0.86

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) → 특허법 PCT 국제특허출원

AI & Digital

cos 0.86
Keywords
WIPODesign Law TreatyDLT디자인법조약디자인보호법industrial design산업디자인디자인등록화상디자인디지털디자인특허청design protection디자인보호
Score Guide
Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.
Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #wipo-design-law-2