Rights & Anti-corruption

OECD Recommendation on Regulatory Policy and Governance OECD Regulatory Policy Framework → 한국 행정규제기본법 → 국무조정실 / 규제개혁위원회

국무조정실 / 규제개혁위원회

BProbable echo

Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Probable echo

Semantic

Strong semantic alignment

Temporal

Global precedent precedes Korea

Linkage

Official Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Multilingual semantic similarity

cosine similarity (method detail)0.810

Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.810); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.

Could also be…show

•Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
•Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
•A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

11 year lag

From date field: 2012-2023 · 2012-2023

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Bprobable echo · 75%

SemanticStrong semantic alignment
TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Matched concepts: regulatory impact analysis (RIA) ↔ 규제영향분석(RIA); ex-post evaluation ↔ 규제일몰제; stakeholder engagement ↔ 규제개혁신문고

Cross-lingual similarity 50/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: OECD Regulatory Policy Framework → 한국 행정규제기본법 (Regulatory Reform System) | https //www → https //www

Matched Concepts

3 pairs

GlobalKorean Echo

regulatory impact analysis (RIA)

↓→

규제영향분석(RIA)

ex-post evaluation

↓→

규제일몰제

stakeholder engagement

↓→

규제개혁신문고

Agenda Arc

Curated

Global purpose, Korean purpose, and precursor stages. Reasoning echo is discourse observation — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

The OECD Recommendation on Regulatory Policy and Governance (2012) sets out principles for regulatory quality including: Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA), stakeholder engagement and public consultation, ex-post evaluation of regulations, regulatory coherence across levels of g…

Korean purpose

행정규제기본법은 OECD 규제정책 프레임워크의 핵심 원칙을 국내 규제개혁 체계에 반영하고 있다. 규제영향평가(RIA) 의무화, 규제비용총량제(Cost-in/Cost-out), 규제일몰제, 국민·기업 대상 규제개혁신문고 운영, FTA 규제협력 챕터 이행 등 OECD 권고에 부합하는 규제 거버넌스를 구축하였으며, 2023년 OECD 규제정책 평가에서 '선진' 등급을 획득하였다.

행정규제기본법 — 행정규제기본법은 OECD 규제정책 프레임워크의 핵심 원칙을 국내 규제개혁 체계에 반영하고 있다. 규제영향평가(RIA) 의무화, 규제비용총량제(Cost-in/Cost-out), 규제일몰제, 국민·기업 대상 규제개혁신문고 운영, FTA 규제협력 챕터 이행 등 OECD 권고에 부합하는 규제 거버넌스를 구축하였으며, 2023년 OECD 규제정책 평가에서 '선진' 등급을 획득하였다.

Reasoning echo

Observed framing link: OECD Regulatory Policy Framework → 한국 행정규제기본법 (Regulatory Reform System) | https //www → https //www. Not a claim of coordination.

Started where

OECD Recommendation on Regulatory Policy and Governance (2012)

Started how

via policy learning

Soft lawGlobalOECD Recommendation on Regulatory Policy and Governance (2012)
Global instrument
The OECD Recommendation on Regulatory Policy and Governance (2012) sets out principles for regulatory quality including: Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA), stakeholder engagement and public consultation, ex-post evaluation of regulations, regulatory coherence across levels of g…
Primary source
LegislationKorea국무조정실 / 규제개혁위원회
행정규제기본법
행정규제기본법은 OECD 규제정책 프레임워크의 핵심 원칙을 국내 규제개혁 체계에 반영하고 있다.
Primary source

Original (Global)

OECD Regulatory^① Policy principles include RIA, stakeholder engagement^③, ex-post evaluation^②, and IRC.

Echo (Korea)

행정규제기본법은 OECD 규제정책 원칙을 반영하여 RIA, 규제비용총량제, 규제일몰제^②, 규제개혁신문고^③를 제도화하였다.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified

hasKoreanSource

hasGlobalSource

hasDate

keywordDiversity

agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning

Origin

OECD Recommendation on Regulatory Policy and Governance (2012)

Timeline

2012-2023

OECD Regulatory Policy Framework → 한국 행정규제기본법 (Regulatory Reform System) | https //www → https //www

Sources

🌍OECD LEGAL-0426 (Regulatory Policy)archived

🇰🇷행정규제기본법 archived

Related Patterns

OECD PISA → Korean Education Reform Waves

OECD

20%

OECD CARF → Korean Crypto Asset Taxation

OECD

20%

ECEC Integration & OECD Early Childhood Policy

OECD

20%

OECD BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax

OECD

20%

OECD AI Principles & Korea AI Framework Act

OECD

20%

OECD Common Reporting Standard → Korea AEOI / AXIS Tax Transparency

OECD

P(B|A) = 30%agenda

20%

OECD Digital Government Recommendation → Korea Digital Government Platform

OECD

P(B|A) = 35%agenda

20%

OECD Pension Recommendations → Korea National Pension Reform

OECD

P(B|A) = 35%agenda

20%

Semantically Related

Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.

OECD Digital Government Recommendation → Korea Data-Based Administration Act

Digital ID / DPI

cos 0.88

OECD Green Budgeting Framework → 한국 녹색예산제도 (Green Budget Tagging)

Climate

cos 0.88

OECD DAC ODA Standards → 국제개발협력기본법 (Korea ODA Framework)

Rights & Anti-corruption

cos 0.87

OECD Digital Government Recommendation → Korea Digital Government Platform

AI & Digital

cos 0.87

UNESCO SDG 4 → Korea Framework Act on Education

Education

cos 0.87

Consumer Product Safety & OECD GlobalRecalls

Health & Bio

cos 0.87

Keywords

regulatory policyRIAregulatory reform규제정책행정규제기본법규제영향평가규제일몰제

Score Guide

Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.

Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.

Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.