Skip to content
Digital ID / DPI

EU GDPR / EDPB GDPR Art. 33–34 Breach Notification → 개인정보보호법·PIPC 고시 → Personal Information Protection Commission

개인정보보호위원회 (Personal Information Protection Commission)

CSuggestive similarity
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Suggestive similarity
Semantic
Moderate keyword/concept overlap
Temporal
Global precedent precedes Korea
Linkage
No recorded linkage
Multilingual semantic similarity
cosine similarity (method detail)0.810

Computed with intfloat/multilingual-e5-small multilingual embeddings. Display score is a calibrated mapping of the raw cross-lingual cosine (0.810); higher means closer meaning. Reflects semantic similarity, not proof of causation.

Could also be…show
  • •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

7 year lag
  1. Global

    2016

    EU GDPR / EDPB

    commission.europa.eu

  2. then Korea
  3. Korea

    2023

    개인정보보호법 (국가법령정보센터)

    law.go.kr

From date field: GDPR 2016/2018 → PIPA reform 2020 → PIPC Breach Notification Rules 2021 → Amended 2023 · 2016–2023

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Csuggestive similarity · 75%

  • SemanticModerate keyword/concept overlap
  • TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
  • LinkageNo recorded linkage

Matched concepts: gdpr ↔ 개인정보

Cross-lingual similarity 50/100 (multilingual e5 embedding) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: GDPR Art. 33–34 Breach Notification → 개인정보보호법·PIPC 고시 (PIPC Breach Notification Rules) | gdpr → 개인정보

Caveat: semantic similarity only — this tier records a hypothesis, not proof of causal influence.

Matched Concepts

1 pairs
gdpr
↓
개인정보

Suggested Concepts

1 suggested

Auto-aligned concept pairs surfaced by our Concept Suggester engine. Shown as supplementary leads — the curated matches above are the authoritative set.

GDPR Articles 33–34 require controllers to notify the supervisory authority within 72 hours and communicate high-risk breaches to data subjects without undue delay.
Keyword↓
PIPC는 개인정보보호법 및 침해사고 통지·신고 고시를 통해 GDPR 침해통지 체계를 도입하여 72시간 이내 신고 의무, 1천명 이상 개별통지, 위험도 평가기준, 과징금 부과기준을 규정하고 있다.

Agenda Arc

Curated

Global purpose, Korean purpose, and precursor stages. Reasoning echo is discourse observation — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

GDPR Articles 33–34 require data controllers to notify the supervisory authority of a personal data breach within 72 hours of becoming aware of it, and to communicate the breach to affected data subjects without undue delay when the breach is likely to result in high risk.

Korean purpose

개인정보보호위원회는 개인정보보호법 및 개인정보 침해사고 통지·신고에 관한 고시를 통해 GDPR 침해통지 체계를 국내에 도입하여, 개인정보처리자의 침해사고 인지 후 72시간 이내(주말·공휴일 포함) PIPC 신고 의무, 1천명 이상 정보주체 대상 침해 시 개별통지 의무, 침해사고 위험도 평가기준(정보의 민감도·규모·2차 피해 가능성), PIPC의 침해사고 조사 및 과징금 부과기준(매출액 3% 이하)을 규정하고 있다.

개인정보보호법 (국가법령정보센터) — 개인정보보호위원회는 개인정보보호법 및 개인정보 침해사고 통지·신고에 관한 고시를 통해 GDPR 침해통지 체계를 국내에 도입하여, 개인정보처리자의 침해사고 인지 후 72시간 이내(주말·공휴일 포함) PIPC 신고 의무, 1천명 이상 정보주체 대상 침해 시 개별통지 의무, 침해사고 위험도 평가기준(정보의 민감도·규모·2차 피해 가능성), PIPC의 침해사고 조사 및 과징금 부과기준(매출액 3% 이하)을 규정하고 있다.

Reasoning echo

Observed framing link: GDPR Art. 33–34 Breach Notification → 개인정보보호법·PIPC 고시 (PIPC Breach Notification Rules) | gdpr → 개인정보. Not a claim of coordination.

Started where

EU GDPR / EDPB

Started how

GDPR 2016/2018 → PIPA reform 2020 → PIPC Breach Notification Rules 2021 → Amended 2023

  1. Soft lawGlobal2016EU GDPR / EDPB
    GDPR 2016/2018

    GDPR 2016/2018

    Primary source
  2. StageGlobal2020EU GDPR / EDPB
    PIPA reform 2020

    PIPA reform 2020

  3. StageKorea2021개인정보보호위원회 (Personal Information Protection Commission)
    PIPC Breach Notification Rules 2021

    PIPC Breach Notification Rules 2021

    Primary source
  4. Soft lawGlobal2023EU GDPR / EDPB
    Amended 2023

    Amended 2023

Original (Global)

GDPR① Articles 33–34 require controllers to notify the supervisory authority within 72 hours and communicate high-risk breaches to data subjects without undue delay.

Echo (Korea)

PIPC는 개인정보①보호법 및 침해사고 통지·신고 고시를 통해 GDPR 침해통지 체계를 도입하여 72시간 이내 신고 의무, 1천명 이상 개별통지, 위험도 평가기준, 과징금 부과기준을 규정하고 있다.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning
Origin
EU GDPR / EDPB
Timeline

2016–2023

GDPR Art. 33–34 Breach Notification → 개인정보보호법·PIPC 고시 (PIPC Breach Notification Rules) | gdpr → 개인정보

Sources

🌍Global source
🇰🇷개인정보보호법 (국가법령정보센터)

Related Patterns

EU GDPR Data Subject Rights → 개인정보보호법 시행령 (PIPA Enforcement Decree)

EUOECD
P(B|A) = 79%temporal
48%

GDPR Art. 35 DPIA → 개인정보보호법·PIPC 영향평가 고시 (PIPC DPIA Guidance)

EUOECD
P(B|A) = 78%temporal
46%

GDPR Chapter V Cross-Border Data Transfers → 개인정보보호법·PIPC 국외이전 고시 (PIPC Cross-Border Transfer Rules)

EUOECD
P(B|A) = 77%temporal
45%

Corporate Sustainability Reporting (CSRD-style)

EUOECD
P(B|A) = 35%agenda
40%

Consumer Product Safety & OECD GlobalRecalls

OECDEU
P(B|A) = 35%agenda
40%

EU DAC6 Mandatory Disclosure Rules → Korea Tax Avoidance Reporting

EUOECD
P(B|A) = 45%agenda
40%

EU GDPR → Korea Personal Information Protection Act Reform

EU
P(B|A) = 65%temporal
30%

Green Taxonomy / K-Taxonomy Classification

EUOECD
P(B|A) = 35%agenda
27%

Semantically Related

Closest patterns by multilingual embedding (e5) — conceptual similarity beyond shared keywords. A computed signal, not a sourced claim.

GDPR Art. 35 DPIA → 개인정보보호법·PIPC 영향평가 고시 (PIPC DPIA Guidance)

Digital ID / DPI

cos 0.93

GDPR Chapter V Cross-Border Data Transfers → 개인정보보호법·PIPC 국외이전 고시 (PIPC Cross-Border Transfer Rules)

Digital ID / DPI

cos 0.91

EU GDPR Data Subject Rights → 개인정보보호법 시행령 (PIPA Enforcement Decree)

Digital ID / DPI

cos 0.90

EU GDPR (2016/679) → 개인정보보호법 GDPR 상응 체계

Digital ID / DPI

cos 0.88

EU GDPR → Korea Personal Information Protection Act Reform

Digital ID / DPI

cos 0.88

Consumer Product Safety & OECD GlobalRecalls

Health & Bio

cos 0.87
Keywords
GDPRbreach notification침해사고72시간EDPBPIPC개인정보보호위원회개인정보보호법data breach정보주체data subject과징금위험도 평가고시
Score Guide
Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.
Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #gdpr-breach-notification-pipc