Skip to content
Finance

FATF crypto Travel Rule → Korea VASPs AML transfer information → 금융정보분석원

금융정보분석원, 금융위원회

BProbable echo
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Probable echo
Semantic
Strong semantic alignment
Temporal
Global precedent precedes Korea
Linkage
Official Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Could also be…show
  • •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

3 year lag
  1. Global

    2019

    FATF

    fatf-gafi.org

  2. then Korea
  3. Korea

    2022

    특정금융정보법 (국가법령정보센터)

    law.go.kr

First Korean mention특정금융정보법 가상자산 트래블 룰

From date field: FATF R.15 → Korea VASP travel-rule practice · 2019–2026

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Bprobable echo · 82%

  • SemanticStrong semantic alignment
  • TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
  • LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Matched concepts: originator and beneficiary information ↔ 송금인·수취인 정보; virtual asset service providers ↔ 가상자산사업자

Cross-lingual similarity 9/100 (heuristic fallback) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: FATF crypto Travel Rule → Korea VASPs AML transfer information | originator and beneficiary information → 송금인·수취인 정보

Matched Concepts

2 pairs
originator and beneficiary information
↓
송금인·수취인 정보
virtual asset service providers
↓
가상자산사업자

Agenda Arc

Derived

Built live from origin, soft-law type, timeline, and sources — not a new research claim. Global vs Korean purpose are observed framings — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

FATF Recommendation 15 / Interpretive Note requires virtual asset service providers to obtain, hold, and transmit originator and beneficiary information (“Travel Rule”) for virtual-asset transfers.

Korean purpose

「특정 금융거래정보의 보고 및 이용 등에 관한 법률」 및 가상자산사업자 AML 의무: 이전정보 제공·보관 실무(트래블 룰) 정합. Mapping to FATF R.15 language — not proof of single-source drafting.

특정금융정보법 (국가법령정보센터) — 「특정 금융거래정보의 보고 및 이용 등에 관한 법률」 및 가상자산사업자 AML 의무: 이전정보 제공·보관 실무(트래블 룰) 정합. Mapping to FATF R.15 language — not proof of single-source drafting.

Reasoning echo

Observed framing link: FATF crypto Travel Rule → Korea VASPs AML transfer information | originator and beneficiary information → 송금인·수취인 정보. Not a claim of coordination.

Started where

FATF

Started how

via policy learning — timeline: FATF R.15 → Korea VASP travel-rule practice

  1. CapabilityGlobalFATF
    Virtual-asset market rails

    Pattern text references crypto/virtual-asset rails that soft law later covers.

    Primary source
  2. Soft lawGlobalFATF
    FATF R.15

    FATF R.15

    Primary source
  3. LegislationKorea금융정보분석원
    Korea VASP travel-rule practice

    Korea VASP travel-rule practice

    Primary source
Original (Global)

FATF Recommendation 15 / Interpretive Note requires virtual asset service providers② to obtain, hold, and transmit originator and beneficiary information① (“Travel Rule”) for virtual-asset transfers.

Echo (Korea)

「특정 금융거래정보의 보고 및 이용 등에 관한 법률」 및 가상자산사업자② AML 의무: 이전정보 제공·보관 실무(트래블 룰) 정합. Mapping to FATF R.15 language — not proof of single-source drafting.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning
Origin
FATF
Timeline

2019–2026

FATF crypto Travel Rule → Korea VASPs AML transfer information | originator and beneficiary information → 송금인·수취인 정보

Sources

🌍Global source
🇰🇷특정금융정보법 (국가법령정보센터)

Related Patterns

FATF Virtual Assets Recommendation → Korea Virtual Asset User Protection Act

FATF
P(B|A) = 66%temporal
31%

FATF Travel Rule & Korea Virtual Asset AML Framework

FATF
P(B|A) = 58%category
26%

FATF Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule) → 특정금융정보법 시행령·금융정보분석원 가이드라인 (FIU Travel Rule Guidance)

FATF
P(B|A) = 61%temporal
24%

FATF Travel Rule (Virtual Assets)

FATF
P(B|A) = 59%temporal
21%

FATF 40 Recommendations → 특정금융정보법 FATF 40개 권고사항 이행

FATF
P(B|A) = 60%temporal
20%

FATF Beneficial Ownership Standards → 법인 실소유자 투명성 강화

FATF
P(B|A) = 55%temporal
20%

FATF Risk-Based Approach → 위험기반접근법 국내 도입

FATF
P(B|A) = 45%category
20%

FATF beneficial ownership transparency → Korea central UBO information system

FATF
P(B|A) = 52%temporal
17%
Keywords
Travel RuleVASPvirtual assetsRecommendation 15트래블 룰가상자산특정금융정보법
Score Guide
Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.
Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #fatf-travel-rule-1