Skip to content
Finance

EU DORA ICT operational resilience → Korea electronic financial supervision → Financial Supervisory Service

금융감독원, 금융위원회

BProbable echo
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Probable echo
Semantic
Moderate keyword/concept overlap
Temporal
Global precedent precedes Korea
Linkage
Official Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Could also be…show
  • •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

4 year lag

First Korean mention전자금융 감독·전자금융거래법 트랙

From date field: 2022 DORA → Korea e-finance supervision track · 2022–2026

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Bprobable echo · 72%

  • SemanticModerate keyword/concept overlap
  • TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
  • LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Matched concepts: ICT risk management ↔ 전산·사이버 리스크 관리; critical ICT third-party ↔ 제3자(외주) 의존 점검

Cross-lingual similarity 10/100 (heuristic fallback) — a computed signal, not proof.

Similarity type: EU DORA ICT operational resilience → Korea electronic financial supervision | ICT risk management → 전산·사이버 리스크 관리

Matched Concepts

2 pairs
ICT risk management
↓
전산·사이버 리스크 관리
critical ICT third-party
↓
제3자(외주) 의존 점검

Suggested Concepts

1 suggested

Auto-aligned concept pairs surfaced by our Concept Suggester engine. Shown as supplementary leads — the curated matches above are the authoritative set.

Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) sets ICT risk-management, incident reporting, resilience testing, and critical third-party oversight duties for financial entities in the Union.
Length↓
Comparative mapping of operational-resilience vocabulary — not a claim that DORA was transposed.

Agenda Arc

Derived

Built live from origin, soft-law type, timeline, and sources — not a new research claim. Global vs Korean purpose are observed framings — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) sets ICT risk-management, incident reporting, resilience testing, and critical third-party oversight duties for financial entities in the Union.

Korean purpose

「전자금융거래법」 및 금융감독원 전자금융 감독규정: 금융회사 전산·사이버 리스크 관리, 장애·침해 사고 보고, 제3자(외주) 의존 점검 체계. Comparative mapping of operational-resilience vocabulary — not a claim that DORA was transposed.

전자금융거래법 (국가법령정보센터) — 「전자금융거래법」 및 금융감독원 전자금융 감독규정: 금융회사 전산·사이버 리스크 관리, 장애·침해 사고 보고, 제3자(외주) 의존 점검 체계. Comparative mapping of operational-resilience vocabulary — not a claim that DORA was transposed.

Reasoning echo

Observed framing link: EU DORA ICT operational resilience → Korea electronic financial supervision | ICT risk management → 전산·사이버 리스크 관리. Not a claim of coordination.

Started where

EU

Started how

via policy learning — timeline: 2022 DORA → Korea e-finance supervision track

  1. Soft lawGlobal2022EU
    DORA

    2022 DORA

    Primary source
  2. LegislationKorea금융감독원
    Korea e-finance supervision track

    Korea e-finance supervision track

    Primary source
Original (Global)

Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) sets ICT risk-management①, incident reporting, resilience testing, and critical third-party② oversight duties for financial entities in the Union.

Echo (Korea)

「전자금융거래법」 및 금융감독원 전자금융 감독규정: 금융회사 전산·사이버 리스크 관리①, 장애·침해 사고 보고, 제3자(외주②) 의존 점검 체계. Comparative mapping of operational-resilience vocabulary — not a claim that DORA was transposed.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning
Origin
EU
Timeline

2022–2026

EU DORA ICT operational resilience → Korea electronic financial supervision | ICT risk management → 전산·사이버 리스크 관리

Sources

Related Patterns

Keywords
DORAICT riskoperational resiliencethird-party risk전자금융금융감독원사이버 리스크
Score Guide
Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.
Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #eu-dora-operational-resilience-1