Skip to content
AI & Digital

EU Fundamental-rights · basic-rights AI impact assessment → Ministry of Science and ICT

과학기술정보통신부

BProbable echo
Evidence tier

Echo patterns are similarity-based hypotheses, not proof of causation. Open the sources and evaluate the linkage yourself.

Evidence Scorecard

Three lenses — wording, timing, documented link. Not a single proof score.

Probable echo
Semantic
Strong semantic alignment
Temporal
Global precedent precedes Korea
Linkage
Official Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)
Could also be…show
  • •Parallel domestic policy development is possible.
  • •Industry or market pressure may have driven similar language.
  • •A common external shock (e.g., financial crisis, pandemic) could explain parallel adoption.

Timeline of the echo

2 year lag
  1. Global

    2024.06

    EU

    eur-lex.europa.eu

  2. then Korea
  3. Korea

    2026.01.22

    인공지능기본법 제35조 (국가법령정보센터)

    law.go.kr

First Korean mention인공지능기본법 제35조 기본권 영향평가

From date field: 2024 Art.27 → 2026.1 Korea Act+Decree · 2024–2026

Interrogate the Evidence

Answers are rendered directly from this record’s own curated fields — nothing is generated.

Bprobable echo · 85%

  • SemanticStrong semantic alignment
  • TemporalGlobal precedent precedes Korea
  • LinkageOfficial Korean agency source + concept alignment (no explicit citation recorded)

Matched concepts: assessment of the impact on fundamental rights ↔ 사람의 기본권에 미치는 영향을 평가; categories of natural persons and groups likely to be affected … specific risks of harm ↔ 기본권에 영향 받을 가능성이 있는 개인이나 집단 … 위험의 예방·완화

Similarity type: Fundamental-rights / basic-rights AI impact assessment | assessment of the impact on fundamental rights → 사람의 기본권에 미치는 영향을 평가

Matched Concepts

2 pairs
assessment of the impact on fundamental rights
↓
사람의 기본권에 미치는 영향을 평가
categories of natural persons and groups likely to be affected … specific risks of harm
↓
기본권에 영향 받을 가능성이 있는 개인이나 집단 … 위험의 예방·완화

Suggested Concepts

1 suggested

Auto-aligned concept pairs surfaced by our Concept Suggester engine. Shown as supplementary leads — the curated matches above are the authoritative set.

EU AI Act Article 27 requires certain deployers of high-risk AI systems to perform a fundamental rights impact assessment before first use, covering affected groups, specific risks of harm, human oversight and mitigation/governance measures.
Keyword↓
인공지능기본법 제35조는 고영향 인공지능 이용 제품·서비스 제공 시 사람의 기본권에 미치는 영향을 사전에 평가하도록 노력할 의무를 두고, 시행령은 영향받을 개인·집단 식별, 기본권 유형, 사회·경제적 영향, 위험 예방·완화·복구, 개선 이행계획을 평가 항목으로 구체화한다.

Agenda Arc

Derived

Built live from origin, soft-law type, timeline, and sources — not a new research claim. Global vs Korean purpose are observed framings — not proof of coordination.

Global purpose

EU AI Act Article 27 requires certain deployers of high-risk AI systems to perform a fundamental rights impact assessment before first use, covering affected groups, specific risks of harm, human oversight and mitigation/governance measures.

Korean purpose

인공지능기본법 제35조는 고영향 인공지능 이용 제품·서비스 제공 시 사람의 기본권에 미치는 영향을 사전에 평가하도록 노력할 의무를 두고, 시행령은 영향받을 개인·집단 식별, 기본권 유형, 사회·경제적 영향, 위험 예방·완화·복구, 개선 이행계획을 평가 항목으로 구체화한다.

인공지능기본법 제35조 (국가법령정보센터) — 인공지능기본법 제35조는 고영향 인공지능 이용 제품·서비스 제공 시 사람의 기본권에 미치는 영향을 사전에 평가하도록 노력할 의무를 두고, 시행령은 영향받을 개인·집단 식별, 기본권 유형, 사회·경제적 영향, 위험 예방·완화·복구, 개선 이행계획을 평가 항목으로 구체화한다.

Reasoning echo

Observed framing link: Fundamental-rights / basic-rights AI impact assessment | assessment of the impact on fundamental rights → 사람의 기본권에 미치는 영향을 평가. Not a claim of coordination.

Started where

EU

Started how

via policy learning — timeline: 2024 Art.27 → 2026.1 Korea Act+Decree

  1. CapabilityGlobalEU
    AI / generative media capability

    Pattern text references AI or generative-media capability that later regulation addresses.

    Primary source
  2. Soft lawGlobal2024EU
    Art.27

    2024 Art.27

    Primary source
  3. EnforcementKorea2026.1과학기술정보통신부
    Korea Act+Decree

    2026.1 Korea Act+Decree

    Primary source
Original (Global)

EU AI Act Article 27 requires certain deployers of high-risk AI systems to perform a fundamental① rights impact assessment before first use, covering affected groups, specific risks of harm, human oversight and mitigation/governance measures.

Echo (Korea)

인공지능기본법 제35조는 고영향 인공지능 이용 제품·서비스 제공 시 사람의 기본권에① 미치는 영향을 사전에 평가하도록 노력할 의무를 두고, 시행령은 영향받을 개인·집단 식별, 기본권 유형, 사회·경제적 영향, 위험 예방·완화②·복구, 개선 이행계획을 평가 항목으로 구체화한다.

Echo Strength

sourceVerified
hasKoreanSource
hasGlobalSource
hasDate
keywordDiversity
agendaTags

Influence Mechanism

policy learning
Origin
EU
Timeline

2024–2026

Fundamental-rights / basic-rights AI impact assessment | assessment of the impact on fundamental rights → 사람의 기본권에 미치는 영향을 평가

Sources

🌍Global source
🇰🇷인공지능기본법 제35조 (국가법령정보센터)

Related Patterns

High-risk / high-impact AI classification (EU AI Act → 인공지능기본법)

EUMSIT
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

Local / authorised representative for foreign AI providers

EUMSIT
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

EU NIS2 essential-entity cyber duties → Korea network security obligations

EUMSIT
P(B|A) = 50%agenda
40%

EU Cyber Resilience Act product duties → Korea product/network safety framing

EUMSIT
P(B|A) = 50%agenda
40%

EU AI Act Art.50 transparency → Korea AI Basic Act labeling duties

EUMSIT
P(B|A) = 75%temporal
40%

EU Digital Markets Act → Korean Gatekeeper Debate

EU
P(B|A) = 60%temporal
20%

EU Deforestation Regulation → Korea

EU
P(B|A) = 35%agenda
20%

EU Battery Regulation → Korea

EU
P(B|A) = 35%agenda
20%
Keywords
FRIAfundamental rights impact assessment고영향 인공지능 영향평가기본권 영향평가Article 27제35조
Score Guide
Confidence — Editorial A–D tier from semantic, temporal, and linkage evidence.
Echo Strength — Metadata completeness score. Rewards verified sources, paired links, explicit dates, keyword diversity, and origin tags.
Vocabulary Overlap — Heuristic score measuring shared tokens between global and Korean texts. Reflects loanwords and repeated terms, not meaning across languages.
PATTERN #ai-fria-1